'Industrial-Organizational Psychology in Film Essay\r'

'Indus campaign- organizational (I/O) psychological science is the study of hu charm race behavior at browse and it is touch with the development of and application of scientific principles to the escapeplace (Spector, 2008). In this subject field of I/O psychological science in that respect ar many bailiwicks that outlined how individuals volition perform at transaction and how successful they will be. Some of these issues atomic tote up 18 as f on the wholeows aim primer coat signal, Selection, Employee Motivation, Job at cardinalment, Emotions at operate, Burnout, and occupational Stress. In the read, 12 enraged men (Rose et al., 1957) shows mixed topics of I/O psychology that atomic number 18 concerned with the 12 goremans in their civiliseplace and their termination-making.\r\nIn this melodic theme I will apologise how the film, 12 wroth Men (Rose et al., 1957) explains several topics of I/O psychology on how they are applied in the workplace. I will begin by submitn a short synopsis of the film and because explain five dissimilar I/O psychology topics that were portrayed in the film. The I/O psychology topics that I will discuss are as f aloneows, conclusion setting, logical argument contentment, emotions at work, occupational striving, and lastly company think Movie Sypnosis\r\nThe film, 12 gaga Men (Rose et al., 1957) is a classic picture show close to 12 white men deciding the judgment of yardbirdion of a 18 year hoar claw who has allegedly committed murder in the number 1 degree by stabbing and killing his set out to death. The movie begins showing the different dialog boxwomans walking into the motor inn at different times. The presiding judge over the royal court de hold outrs the conclusiveness to the jurywomans that they must nail down if the tiddler is guilt-ridden or non. If the chaff were to be shew abomin equal beyond a bonny dubiety he will be sent to the electric chair. Fallo wing in the film the jurymans are sent to deliberate the doom of the fool. They enter the get on in what was give tongue to to be the hottest day of the summer, barely e real mavin is in laughter and put in to render their decisiveness.\r\nAt the first of all deliberation e really peerless pick outr chipouts at fault except for one man his reason as to why he didn’t class his vote as flagitious was because he couldn’t decide that fast over the spiritedness of a electric shaver. The man is Henry Fonda the main protagonist of the movie, jurywoman number 8 the only juryman who precious to give the kid a chance because a intelligent motion.\r\nThe movie continues with argument from early(a)wise jurors wanting to convict the kid to the electric chair because they panorama he was felonious. save as the discussion heats up jurywoman 8 keeps convincing e very(prenominal)one to a bonnie dubiousness that the kid is non unlawful. As new(prenomina l) jurors began to turn their conclusions the emotions in this workplace escalate and so does the focusing. The convention must come to contrive waterher and roll a finding of fact entirely with dissatisfied jurors and little want how could they? In the end of the movie the final verdict is reach and those who were fast-acting termination making jurors count their vote as not nefarious. I/O Topics\r\nGoal Setting\r\nGoal setting is a opening of motivation and it says that â€Å" mass’s behavior are motivated by their internal intentions, documentals or inclinations” (Spector, 2008 p.207). fit in to the theory it explains that aims are what a person consciously wants to attain and the social occasions that they are going to do to get it. These aspirations elicit be specific or general, for poser cosmos able to run a battle of Marathon is a specific aim but cosmos able to run is a general name and address for roundone. as hale as whatever goa ls are not meant for everyone ones goal should be able to be attained, many goals that rough-and-ready for a orientation might not be necessary from the other.\r\nLocke and Henne (1986) said that at that place were four slip musical mode in which goals affect behavior. First the goals deal to accept attention and action to behaviors the person believes will come across the goal. Second, the goals mobilize effort in that the person will try harder. Third, goals increase persistence and this will issuing in more time spent on behaviors necessary for goal achievement.\r\nAnd finally goals flock motivate the search for effective strategies to attain them. For every goal that is desire by an individual in assure to be effective goals also neediness to fallow four more principles. One of the four principles is that goals must be specific and not vague because one can easily get tangled the objective. Second, goals need to be committed and ware a wizard of ownership to an indi vidual because they are more potential to attain the goal. Third, feedback needfully to be inclined by employer or organization on how an employee is doing. Finally goals need to be difficult because it will result in better performance and the person will work harder to achieve it (Spector, 2008).\r\nIn 12 Angry Men, we tick the goal setting of the different jurors. In the second base scene of the movie when all the jurors entered the deliberation room the juror 1, the Foreman was the leader of voting he organized everyone around the skirt and the goal was to vote on the sentence of guilty and not guilty. juryman 1, main goal was to get the other jurors votes he committed his goal by accepting a showing of hands to those who thought the kid was guilty or not guilty.\r\nAll the jurors goal was to reach a verdict based their vote of guilty or not, everyone was entitled to their own impression since the goal was committed to them and the feedback that they receive from their d ecision was given by the other jurors. Once the first vote was eviscerate to show that all 11 other jurors found the kid to be guilty except for juror 8. Here we pass the entitlement of the goal of juror 8 his goal was to reach a decision and he decided of not guilty. The feedback was have from the other jurors when all of them started to get loud and grumpy because his decision differ from theirs.\r\nThe film demonstrated the topic of goal setting to be use correctly because in the film at the first voting everyone agreed but one person. But as the film elevate the juror’s vote and their final goal began to shift when several factors were put on the table that the kid might not be guilty after all. I/O psychologists explained that the goals needed to be specific and committed, well in the film the juror’s goals was their own opinion to guilty or not and why was. The decision was not informal and many jurors where dissatisfied and their well beingness was not opt imal because it was very hot that afternoon. Using the principles of goal setting could of table serviceed the jurors reached a conclusion kind of right away than they did; if they had all agreed when jurywoman 8 was explaining as to why the kid might not be guilty because a reasonable doubt. Job gratification\r\nJob bliss is how people feel virtually their clienteles, and there are two ways of flavor ponder b littleedness global and scene approach. accord to Spector (2008), the global approach treats play triumph as a single, boilers suit feeling toward the job. But the expression approach say that satisfaction emphasis on different aspects of the job such as pay, supervision, coworkers, communication, benefits, and promotion. many a(prenominal) people express their level of their satisfaction by showing up everyday to work and being on time, also based on the facet approach it can be explain to their pay, few people got to work because they give care the people they work with, or are wanting a promotion, and other factors.\r\nStaw and Cohen-Charash (2005) identified other factors that lead to job satisfaction; the factors are personality, sexuality, and age. These factors contribute to a person boilersuit satisfaction because their personality can link for them to be negativity affectivity, and their locus of ascendancy. You would want some one that is not negative and deem an internal focus of over hang to encounter the best job satisfaction. Also someone who is young is more likely to have a go at it negative job satisfaction than someone who is old and has moved up in the career ladder within the company. A study has come upd that gender has shown to not influence job satisfaction (Witt & concourse A; Nye, 1992).\r\nJob satisfaction in the movie is that of Juror 8 because he could not convict the kid because he was not yet satisfied with the decision of the other jurors. Its reason was that there was a reasonable doubt to not c onvict the kid to murder, centre he wasn’t going to decide that quite quickly. Also other example of job satisfaction was how negative Juror 3 was and Juror 10 when the other jurors began to castrate over their vote. They tried to convince themselves and the others without face at the possibility of a reasonable doubt. These Jurors were very dissatisfied with the other juror’s decision of turning their vote.\r\nThe movie demonstrated job satisfaction to be done correctly it have the appearance _or_ semblanceed, as the cast were to be conform of people who would experience higher(prenominal) levels of job satisfaction than others. It was done correctly because some of the jurors like number 3,7, and 10 showed higher levels of dissatisfaction because of their negativity to evaluate the facts and evidence of a reasonable doubt given by the other jurors. The principles of job satisfaction like their focus of control being able to have internal and controlling their d ecisions rather than relying in powerful facts that the kid was guilty because of the eye witnesses could have lead them to a easier decision.\r\nAnd they will all have experience better well being without take in so angry and dissatisfied. But we can see at the end that the I/O principles were go through and those who were dissatisfied became satisfied whenever they changed their vote of guilty to not guilty because they looked away from their negativity. Also it gave all the jurors a sense of satisfaction for finding a kid that presumably that was guilty to not guilty and relieve his life. Emotions at work\r\nEmotions are explained by Spector (2008) to be an important component of life, and providing not only resources to acquire the necessities of life but a sense of habit and social contacts as well. Also accomplishment is a type of feeling that will provide people with authoritative feelings such as pride, joy. But a heated argument in the workplace can result in feelings of anger and annoyance toward the supervisors or the organization in general. People who experience compulsive and reinforcing emotions at work will perform well in their job duties. Brief and Weiss (2002) said that nerve-racking and aversive emotions at work can establish negative emotions states and moods.\r\nIn the film 12 Angry Men, juror 10 and juror 3 showed the closely emotions mostly negative era juror 8 showed positive emotions part looking for a reasonable doubt that the kid might not be guilty of stabbing his father. Juror 10 said â€Å" the kid lives in the slum, is had a bad take down in the past for knife fighting, his no legal kid that’s why his guilty” (Rose, R. 1957). This juror was very much showing his emotions and most of them seem to be negative that’s why he experience the most dissatisfaction and he had to kept wiping his twist every time he spoke very angrily regarding the matter. Juror 3 treasured to cowpoke Juror 8 because th ey had difference of opinions and Juror 6 wanted to fight juror 3 because he didn’t shut up.\r\nThe movie seems to cover up all the emotions that these state appointed juror showed p solidification of land they were delivering the verdict. It’s a very hard decision to make and when people differ in opinion some of the jurors got really excited and the temper escalated. The topic of emotions at work was demonstrated corrected because in I/O psychology they are concerned in how people behave at work both(prenominal) positively or negatively (Spector, 2008). It was very well show the amount of anger juror 3, and juror 10 had towards the other jurors that gradually change their votes as well not guilty.\r\nThe characters needed to apply positive emotions and deep surface acting to experience less negative emotions towards the matter that they were discussing. If they had better moods and emotions they will had experience more positive reinforcement in their jobs as jur ors. Because positive emotions in the workplace result in better performance in the subject field of the juror will be the decision-making and more satisfaction for their jobs. But the movie is not called 12 Angry Men for no matter, so that’s why many of the jurors expressed negative emotions. Occupational Stress\r\nOccupational stress is a state of being that has experienced by almost everyone. Occupational stress starts with a job stressor, which is a condition at work that requires and adaptational response (Spector, 2008). It is then fallowed by a job strain, which is a reaction to the job stressor. Some of these job stressors identified by Spector (2008), are enjoyment am broaduity, role action, workload, Social stressor and control. In role ambiguity and employee is shot round what their job functions and responsibilities are.\r\nIn role infringe the employee people experience negative demands at work and outside work (extrarole and intrarole). In intrarole are t oo many demands a job is asking of their employee, extrarole occurs when demands from work and nonwork domains become raise. Workload is the amount of work an employee is ask to complete in a genuine time, as to a social stressor is stressful incidents concerning other people often can lead to incivility. Finally control the extent in which employees can make decisions about work.\r\nWith regards to the film an example that depicts occupational stress is the overwhelming decision of whether the kid was guilty or not. A stressful part is when at the reservoir of the voting juror 8 decides that the kid is not guilty he puts himself in a stressful concomitant because his peers do no agree with him and he has to prove to them why he doesn’t think that the kid is guilty. He experiences a grant of role conflict within his job because now all the other 11 jurors are making a lot of demands as to why his decisions is what it is. This is called in the movie intrarole situation b ecause since all the jurors are against his decision to decide that there is a reasonable doubt for the kid not being guilty.\r\nThe movie shows that occupational stress is a major part of being a juror because since everyone is bound to have their own opinion they can all differ from one some other. This stress leads to job stressor that can cause some of the jurors to get burnout in the process, just like juror 7 change his vote to not guilty because he wanted to leave without any reason.\r\nThe I/O topic of occupational stress in the job as a juror is utilize correctly in the movie because it apply to several principles of this topic like role conflict cause intrarole to juror 8 since he was with almost all the weight on his shoulders and the most stress to explain to the other jurors his decision and he also had a social stressor given by the other jurors difference of opinions. Juror 8 was almost assaulted in the movie because he didn’t agree with the rest ultimately he had control of his own decisions and why it lead to the whole jury changing their vote to not guilty. It lead to an overall better decision and more satisfaction flush though there was a lot of stress and tension among the jurors. Group-Think\r\nGroupthink is a phenomenon that can occur when groups make decisions that individual members know are poor decisions. fit to Janis (1972) groupthink is more likely to occur in glutinous groups with strong leadership. Because social pressures to maintain a certain level of conformity and harmony takes over upright decision-making. But that’s not the end we slant always think that every time there is group the phenomenon of groupthink is likely to occurs there are some things we can do to avoid it explained by Janis (1972).\r\nThe first thing leaders should be impartial moderators rather than attempting to gain control. Second, group members should evaluate decision alternatives and stress for information that can support or co nfound their decision. But this is not all to help with this difficulty sometimes is suggested that large groups to be divided into small groups where people can decide better among some critical issues within a organization which in the end can lead to the correct decision.\r\nA well(p) example of groupthink in the movie is when juror 8 decides to cast his votes as not guilty while the other eleven members thought the accuser was guilty. In this case we see that groupthink being evolve as one of the jurors exclaims as to why he would decide that the kid was innocent and he insisted that juror 8 had overleap all the evidence. Juror 8 said, â€Å" I am not saying he didn’t do it, but there is a possibility that he didn’t, I have a reasonable doubt” (Rose, R. 1957). Juror 8 decisions to go against the other jurors vote is thought by him to be right while the other eleven jurors knew their decision was the right one. He thought that the decision for all eleven members to cast their vote as guilty was wrong and he wanted an explanation as to why they thought the kid was guilty.\r\nThe movie demonstrated the topic being use incorrectly because the group did not wanted to agree with the other juror that thought the group decision was wrong. The leader being juror 1 didn’t sit impartial to the decision while he let some others like juror 2 and 10 control the decisions of the whole group of jurors. Also the other jury members did not evaluated their decision to cast their vote as guilty to either supported or refuted it they just kind of went what the leaders were voting.\r\nThe topic would had been shown more effectively in the movie if the group of jurors had divided in to two groups and both evaluated different sides of evidence and then presented each other and make a vote from there. Rather I was open where a few that stood strong in their decisions where fallow by those who didn’t. Also another big issue is that there was no diversity among the groups it was an all white jury with no women or anything that was different. peradventure if the director would have added a women or a person of color into the group to have another point of view from a different background the decision might have been better received at first. Conclusion\r\nIn the world that we live today there are many jobs and different principles of I/O psychology that can be apply to a specific job. It is not flabby dealing with the demanding qualifications some jobs require and with the certain things an employee needs to put up with. As depicted in the film 12 Angry Men, being a juror in a specific trial can take a toll on the jurors, but in this film we saw that the jury had a clear and identifiable goal that was to reach a verdict concerning the life of 18-year-old kid.\r\nThe juror satisfaction of this state appointed job might not always be the best at the beginning because of their different attitudes, but I can be very rewardi ng to save a persons life in the end. Emotions are a key thing jurors face when facing a hard decisions but always being positive and staying clear of the objective can help with the decision. But at the alike time with emotions can bring a lot of stress for this occupation a juror must be able to face it and control and look into the bigger perspective. In the end we use groupthink to make decision being diverse will help an reach decisions rather quickly but sometimes it will not work out that way for those power hungry individuals. There will be no more rewarding job then going home knowing that you did the right thing and helped society.\r\nReferences\r\nRose, R. (writer), Lumet, S. (director), Fonda, H. (writer). (1957). 12 Angry men. [Motion Picture]. United States: Orion-Nova Productions\r\nSpector, P. E. (2008). Industrial and Organizational Behavior, 5th Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.\r\n'