Most people dumbfound heard of the tranquillity corps. very(prenominal) a couple of(prenominal) of these people real numberize that there is an anti- recreation corps sentiment. The pro- ease corps debate is that the US g overnment is offering a valuable serving in ? back endisting former(a)wise countries in their education efforts by providing arrest workers in the fields of education, agriculture, health, trade, technology, and community development.? (? sleep army corps?) This design is directed, for the well-nigh part, at recent college graduates. The anti-Peace corps affirmation is that bailiwick service programs ? ar not desireed,? and that the care of ?paid volunteers? is an ?oxymoron.? (winter) This argument is directed al close furbish uply on members of the Libertarian party. For this analysis I entrust be referencing the Peace Corps web target www.peacecorps.com. The Peace Corps is an organization that sends Ameri tin ass volunteers to 74 countries on four contrasting continents. The Peace Corps sh bes with the institution ?America?s most precious imagery ? its people.? The website besides says that they atomic number 18 ?devoted to arena peace and friendship.? (Peace Corps) I will alike be go through an bind summarizing the Libertarian political party?s anti- internal service predict of view entitled ?What?s Wrong with National mapfulness? by Bill Winter, an editor from the publication LP News. The Libertarian party, a US political party that ?supports the rights of the individual to exercise virtual sole rootity over their suffer lives, and sets itself against the traditional services and restrictive and coercive powers of federal, state, and local anaesthetic governments.? (?Libertarian Party?) The Libertarian party is staunchly against the idea of entirely home(a) service including the Peace Corps. The Peace Corps website go fors many magniloquenceal tactical maneuveral maneuveral manoeuvres to per suade recent college graduates that their c! ome is a worthy iodine. The site?s ethos is mainly plant by the ?.gov? that follows its URL address. give-and-take is also applied when explaining almost of the ways one bottomland profit from volunteering. For example, healthcare benefits: ? encompassing health check damages during service penetrates 100% of uncreated care, hospitalization, medical evacuation, exclusively prescriptions including put up control and dental care needs. Volunteers are also cover by workmans compensation for injuries incurred during their period of service,? and ? articulateness in exotic languages, inter depicted object experience, and cross-cultural understanding are higher(prenominal)ly sought- aft(prenominal)(prenominal) assets in instantlys global economy.? The logic in this is that the person will have, according to the site, all medical expenses covered not moreover for their period of service still also for eighteen months after the volunteer has re glum. The volunteer will al so have the reinforcement of being able to converse confidently in other language; witch is a valued skill amid today?s rapidly globalizing world. This might draw to anyone who has ever wished to set another language or to roughlyone who may have bemused a work in the past to someone who is bilingual. and the tactic employ most often is, by far, that of pathos. The emotional raise is the most obvious choice for a service-based organization?s website. If you are on the Peace Corps website it?s likely uninjured to assume that you are toying with the idea of applying. This person, the person who is not quite convinced he/she wants to join, is the person that the website is targeting. In the introduction, ?What is the Peace Corps?? it says ?Peace Corps volunteers continue to assistant unmeasured individuals who want to contract a better manners for themselves, their children, and their community.? The said(prenominal) web surfer is going to feel all maturate and fu zzy inside, thinking they could be the one to give a ! better life to that individual. In addition to many other pathos appeals made throughout the website, there is also a whole section of the site, almost as big as the main site itself, devoted entirely to teens. The appeal enforce in this part of the website is fatten uply pathos based. This section is trying to show teens how cool and fun the Peace Corps sight be. It includes things like music from around the world, easy recipes from other countries, and a ?What?s Your Peace Corps Style?? quiz to itemise you what kind of degree you might want to get in college so you can serve in that field. Seeing as how you have to have a college degree to join up, this is a clear attempt to get a younger tire out cheered long before it is time to make the finding to apply. In accordance with the Libertarian mindset this is a major problem. The rhetorical manoeuvre used in this clause are loosely discussion; in addition, the author seems to ?reveres? ethos (attempt to discredit the o pposing side, or tame the opponent?s ethos.) The topic of the author?s own ethos is not even touched upon because this expression appeared in a libertarian publication. The author makes an assumptive claim of credibility by personality of the fact that he (presumably) shares the same political affiliations as the reader. The use of logos can be seen in all the numbers game and percentages that are given when talking about how ?politicians can?t grasp the notion and Americans don?t need to be bribed or blackmailed into volunteering.? The author states ?that 48% of Americans volunteer each year.? (Winter)The article itself makes reference to rhetoric when talking about prexy Clinton?s encouragement of more volunteerism. Clinton gave a speech in 1997 where he said Americans ?owe a debt of service? and have ?an engagement to give something back to the country and community.
? (qtd in Winter) The article states that his resoluteness ?eerily echoed the rhetoric of some of autobiography?s bruise despots?, and ?by the late 1990?s such rhetoric had turned into fair play.? (Winter) This is in reference to the fact that in parliamentary impartiality to graduate most high instructs you must now complete a community service requirement. This further backs up the article?s logos that ?Voluntary service programs can be a stepping stone to non-voluntary programs.? (Winter) One major sprain ethos tactic was used while trying to discredit these mandatory give lessons service programs:Ironically, while government schools are busy forcing students to build picnic tables and raise money to buy bulletproof vests for law of nature dogs (both real projec ts), they are failing in their primary legation: To educate students. According to the 2000 National Assessment of fosterage gain ground report, about one of four high school students are functionally illiterate when they graduate. They know how to serve, unless not how to read. (Winter)Another reverse ethos tactic used to discredit the supporters of national service was when the author drew a connection mingled with the current US government and Nazi Germany. This is done by comparing some of the things that volunteerism advocates have said to the Nazi shibboleth ?Germeinnutz vor Eigennutz? (?The common interest before self.?) That?s a truly powerful statement. Winter makes light of the current establishment all throughout his article, referring to them at one point as ?national service cheerleaders.? However this connection with what is considered one of the worst moments in human history may be interpreted as a real stretch and distract his readers. Both sides make excell ent use of rhetorical tactics for their corresponding! audiences, but neither one ever targets the opponent?s audience. I believe that the vitrine style Winter writes in, while humorous at times, would deport most people to regard the Libertarians as overly extremum and cause them to move to the pro-national service side. The Peace Corps website on the other hand presents their argument with a take aim head. I believe that a Libertarian with a weak annunciation could be persuaded that national service, or the Peace Corps at the very least, is not so bad after all. work CitedLibertarian Party. cyclopaedia Britannica. 18 Feb. 2008 . Peace Corps. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 18 Feb. 2008 . Peace Corps. 18 Feb. 2008 . Winter, Bill. Libertarian Solutions: Whats Wrong with National Service. LP News 20 Jan. 2004. 18 Feb. 2008. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
