Is utilitarianism a useful method of making decisions about abortion Essay

To what completion is utilitarianism a useful method of making decisions about spontaneous abortion?Utilitarianism is a consequentialist hypothesis that, as suggested, looks at the consequences of the satiation and what the outcome is most in all probability to be. Therefore, this theory does not uphold the idea that no matter what the emplacement all manners is sacred it focuses on maximizing happiness for the individual. approximately whitethorn postulate that utilitarianism is useful because the charwoman is given the choice. This promotes womens rights as, ultimately, the woman is who will carry the babe and primarily cargon for the child, if not to the full care for the child, in the first years of its life. After childbirth, which for just about women is an fantastically daunting prospect, many omen suffer from depression and bodily complications.Therefore, some would argue that utilitarianism is a good approach because the woman can direct the conscious and ration al decisions to either undergo pregnancy or not. some women whitethorn also feel that they are not prepared to be a mother and that it is not fair for them to bring a child into an unhealthy environment where she is struggling. This then means that the theory can be used to prevent an unprepared mother form being compel to draw a child, therefore, creating happiness.However, some would dis equate with utilitarianism because it allows for a quick stool solution to short term happiness. Christians believe that e precise child is a gift from the Lord and the bible states that man was made in perfections image Genesis. Furthermore, every child is a potential life that is there to be cared for a cherished which, if aborted, will never have the opportunity to flourish in society. Some may argue that if the woman is given all the rights over whether the child is aborted or not, the father and the families of the parents may also be heavily affected by the loss of a potential family m ember, which can lead to depression.In addition, some may agree that utilitarianism is a useful method because it looks at the circumstances of the abortion. Traumatic experiences, including infraction or molestation, can all lead to an unwanted and unplanned pregnancy. Utilitarianism allows the federal agency of the individual to be taken into account and so abortion would be seen as acceptable if the woman has had her rights abused and is, in turn, pregnant.This is because, those that follow the theory can foresee that due to the child being unwanted, the mother may feel hatred towards the child because of the circumstances that she was placed in, also stellar(a) to resentment. The mother may also be in an unfit ruttish state to properly take care of a child, which is unfair as every child has the right to be loved and looked after by its parents. Furthermore, the greatest happiness is achieved because the woman can then reevaluate her bunk and overcome the pain she has been forced to experience, before having a child.Lastly, some would argue against this point because it cannot predict the long-term consequences of abortion. There is no guarantee that if a woman has been raped she will resent and hate her child, and there is no saying that the child may in fact aid her emotional recovery and will be very much loved. There are also physical problems. If a woman has an abortion when she is young, she may adjudicate to conceive years later only to find that she is infertile from the abortion that she previously had. An abortion can also be a very traumatic experience than can lead to potential emotional slander and regret.To conclude, these points show both sides of the argument that utilitarianism is a useful approach to abortion, show that in some cases looking at the situation allows for a slick slope of acceptability when considering abortion.